1 · The essentials
Imagine choosing the positions of three particles, each with the same prescribed spread in space. The cost increases when particles come close together, and the goal is to make its average as small as possible. One approach chooses the second and third positions entirely from the first position, using fixed rules. This manuscript constructs a smooth spread of particles in three-dimensional space for which no such rules reach the lowest possible average Coulomb cost. Allowing more general joint choices does reach that minimum. Yet fixed rules can get arbitrarily close, so the difference is about reaching the best value, not about the value itself. The manuscript also gives suitable examples in every dimension at least two for every positive inverse-power interaction exponent. The main result has a Lean formalization, though the supplied source does not specify its exact coverage.
A picture to help (an imperfect image, not to be taken literally)
As an imperfect everyday image, imagine arranging three people's meeting locations while keeping each person's usual pattern of visits unchanged. Requiring the second and third locations to follow fixed instructions from the first resembles the restricted problem; allowing a broader joint schedule resembles the relaxed problem. In the manuscript's examples, fixed instructions can approach the best average score but never achieve it.
Why it matters
The result separates two questions that can look identical: whether a restricted method gets arbitrarily close to the optimum, and whether it actually reaches it. It also shows that a smooth prescribed density does not, by itself, guarantee an optimal deterministic description of the three-particle configuration.
2 · Going further
The three-marginal problem prescribes the same probability distribution for each of three positions and minimizes their average interaction cost. In the Coulomb case on , the cost is . The Monge formulation restricts configurations to , where and are Borel maps preserving the prescribed distribution. The Kantorovich formulation allows general joint probability distributions with those same marginals.
The main manuscript constructs a smooth, compactly supported probability density on whose square root is also smooth and compactly supported. For this density, it states that no pair of preserving Borel maps attains the Kantorovich minimum. At the same time, it constructs preserving maps whose costs approach that minimum, giving equality of the Monge and Kantorovich infima despite Monge nonattainment.
The abstract describes the argument at the level of these constructions: a density exhibiting nonattainment, together with preserving maps approaching the relaxed minimum. It does not supply the mechanism that excludes optimal maps or the details of the approximating construction. It also states the corresponding result for for every and , with a suitable smooth identical marginal in each case. Only the main manuscript is supplied here, so no relationship to companion manuscripts can be described.
Useful notions
- Probability densities and joint distributions
- Expected cost and minimization
- A minimum versus an infimum
- Maps that preserve a probability distribution
- Smoothness and compact support
What was known before / what is new
Before
The source frames the question as a test of the Monge ansatz: whether optimal three-particle configurations can be described by two deterministic maps from the first particle. It contrasts that restriction with the Kantorovich formulation, which permits general joint distributions. No earlier theorem, historical timeline, or attribution of the question is supplied.
New
The manuscript presents a smooth, compactly supported Coulomb example in three dimensions, with a smooth, compactly supported square root of the density, for which no preserving pair of Borel maps attains the minimum. It also constructs preserving maps approaching the Kantorovich minimum, so the two infima agree. The manuscript extends this combination of nonattainment and equality of infima to every positive inverse-power exponent in every dimension at least two, using a suitable density for each case.
Limits and assumptions
These are existence results for specially constructed identical marginals, not claims about every smooth density. The Coulomb example is on three-dimensional space; the inverse-power extension assumes and . The abstract explicitly gives compact support and a smooth, compactly supported square root for the Coulomb density, but does not explicitly give those additional properties for every density in the extension. The main result has a Lean formalization; the supplied source does not specify which constructions or extensions that formalization covers. No remaining open problem is identified in the supplied text.
Mini glossary
- Marginal —
- The probability distribution of one particle's position within a joint distribution of several positions.
- Monge formulation —
- The optimization problem in which the other particle positions are deterministic functions of the first, with the required distributions preserved.
- Kantorovich formulation —
- The optimization problem allowing any joint probability distribution with the prescribed marginals.
- Infimum —
- The greatest lower bound on possible costs, whether or not any allowed configuration reaches it.
- Nonattainment —
- The failure of every allowed candidate to reach the infimum.
- Inverse-power interaction —
- An interaction whose pairwise cost is distance raised to a negative power, with .
Keywords : Optimal transport · Coulomb interaction · Monge nonattainment
AI-generated explanation based on the manuscript. Unofficial. Refer to the manuscript for the authoritative version.
3 · Technical details and sources
Claim made in the manuscript (source text)
An optimal three-particle Coulomb configuration need not be a deterministic function of the first particle, even for smooth identical spatial densities. The Monge and Kantorovich infima agree, but the Monge infimum is not attained. The same phenomenon occurs for every inverse-power Riesz exponent in each dimension at least two, with a suitable density in each case.
Verified by Lean: the Lean software checked the part of the reasoning described below, sometimes only part of the manuscript. This does not mean independent mathematicians have validated the result.
Manuscripts in this family
A counterexample to the Monge ansatz for the three-marginal Coulomb cost
25/09/2026We construct a smooth compactly supported probability density on ℝ3, with a smooth compactly supported square root, for which the three-marginal Coulomb transport minimum is not attained by any pair of measure-preserving Borel maps. Nevertheless, the Monge and Kantorovich infima agree: we construct preserving maps whose costs approach the Kantorovich minimum. For every d ≥ 2 and s > 0, we also construct a smooth identical marginal with the same nonattainment and equality-of-infima properties for the inverse-power interaction on ℝd.